Jesus and Social Justice

Glenn Beck
Image via Wikipedia

In 2010, the controversial US TV/Media personality, Glenn Beck (pictured at right) asked Christians to leave churches that promoted social justice and economic justice. Beck’s call reflects the ongoing debate among Christians on social justice’s role in the faith. It is a good launching pad for a discussion on Jesus and Social Justice. Did Jesus preach about social justice? Or did he merely preach about charity and mercy, which are different from social justice? Should Christians and the Church consider social justice activism as central or peripheral to the Christian faith?

Beck: Social Justice = Nazis & Communists

According to Glenn Beck, social justice and economic justice are code words for Nazism and Communism, apparently. If you are unfamiliar with the controversy surrounding Glenn Beck’s radio and TV proclamations, you can read the following CNN news by clicking this link.

Beck’s fear mongering aside, there are a great number of Christians, Evangelicals especially, who are suspicious of social activism as something that distracts from the church’s mission of evangelism. More and more Christians, however,  see the necessity of both social justice and evangelism as important components of God’s mission. See, for example, this blog by an Orthodox Christian, for instance, as a thoughtful view on the social justice vs. evangelism debate within evangelicalism and a thoughtful, Orthodox solution to the impasse, which required also a redefinition of evangelicalism’s theory of salvation and more specifically doctrine of atonement.

My own personal Neo-Reformed 3D (three-dimensional) Christianity perspective on this debate is that both evangelism and social activism are integral to God’s mission. They are emphasizing different dimensions – evangelism focuses on what I currently call the confessional-cultic dimension (our faith-confessing religious ways of spirituality) while social activism focuses on the communal-covenantal dimension (our social relationships ways of spirituality). BOTH of these dimensions are part of a three-dimensional spirituality (the creational-cultural dimension being the third). It’s not that evangelism is spiritual and social activism is merely ethical. Both are spiritual ways we relate to God and serve God’s mission.

Jesus On His Mission

In the news clip above, Jim Wallis referred to Luke 4:18-19 where Jesus read from the Hebrew Bible’s Isaiah 61:1-2 and Isaiah 58:6 to essentially define his mission:

18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” (TNIV)

So often, Christians have spiritualized this passage to mean that Jesus’ mission is about the spiritually poor, the spiritually imprisoned, the spiritually blind and the spiritually oppressed. But in the original context of Isaiah 58 and 61, it was clearly a here-and-now justice and mercy that was in mind (with perhaps an eye to future fulfillment). Isaiah 58:6 for instance clearly connects acts of justice with acts of piety (justice and fasting): “Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke?”

I preached a sermon connected to this theme at Friendship Community CRC on Nov. 7, 2010. Most of the following is adapted from that sermon titled, “The Least of These” with textual references to Matthew 25:31-46Ezekiel 34:15-24 and Matthew 7:21-23.

The Parable of the Sheep & Goats

Now in ancient Palestine, sheep and goats usually graze together. Shepherds usually separate them at night because goats need to be warm at night while sheep prefer open air. So this separation of sheep and goats happens all the time. Jesus uses this as a picture of judgment day: at the end of the day, Jesus the King will judge between the righteous and the wicked. Now sheep was regarded as more valuable than goats because they provide both wool and meat. So, sheep was often regarded as good, while goats have been symbolically used as bad. The right hand was also the preferred side in ancient times, so the sheep or the righteous were on Jesus’ right, while the wicked goats were on his left. The criterion for judgment for deciding between sheep and goat is kindness to “the least of these”. Did you feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, show hospitality to the stranger, clothe the naked, and visit the sick and imprisoned?

I think Jesus here is alluding to Ezekiel in the Old Testament. In Ezekiel 34:15-24, we read how “Ezekiel as well used this process [of separating animals] as a picture of judgment: distinguishing ‘between one sheep and another, and between rams and goats’ symbolized for him the judgment of God on Israel for their ungodly treatment of the poor and needy. Ezekiel and Jesus both talk about love for the rest of the flock, specifically about the sharing of water and food with the weak and lowly, the ones with whom the shepherd identifies.” (Dictionary of Biblical Imagery, p. 332)

The difference is that Ezekiel is not separating sheep from goats but judging between the fat, strong sheep and the thin, weak sheep, as in v. 20-22: “See, I [the Lord] myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep. Because you shove with flank and shoulder, butting all the weak sheep with your horns until you have driven them away, I will save my flock, and they will no longer be plundered. I will judge between one sheep and another.” (TNIV) Ezekiel is talking about how Israel’s rich and powerful treats Israel’s poor and needy. In Ezekiel, God is angry at how the fat sheep keep getting fatter and bully the lean ones, even driving the lean ones away from the pasture – not giving the poor access to food. This is not only a charity issue but also a justice issue. There’s a systemic structural reason for the thin sheep staying thin and getting thinner! That is why in Ezekiel 34:16, God promises: “I will search for the lost and bring back the strays. I will bind up the injured and strengthen the weak, but the sleek and the strong I will destroy. I will shepherd the flock with justice.” (TNIV) [emphasis mine]

In a cursory reading of Matthew 25, it might seem like there’s no social justice involved but only social charity – feeding the hungry, visiting the sick, etc. But when we read it in light of Ezekiel’s imagery that Jesus alludes to, we see that justice underlies the image. God who placed Jesus, the son of David, as the shepherd over his people is the God who will shepherd his flock with justice. God’s will for the least of these – for the poor, the oppressed, the marginalized – is that God’s people do charity and justice for them.

In Matthew 7:21-23, Jesus said: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only those who do the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ “(TNIV) There’s a parallel between Matthew 7 and 25. In Matthew 25, we see both sheep and goats calling Jesus “Lord” and responding in surprise at Jesus’ judgment.

Jesus: No Social Justice = I Never Knew You

These passages in Matthew might be a warning to believers – to those who call Jesus “Lord” – about what doing God’s will really means. It is NOT simply public acknowledgement (maybe worship?) of Jesus – “not everyone who says to me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven.” It is NOT prophesying in Jesus’ name. It is NOT driving out demons in Jesus’ name. It is NOT in performing miracles in Jesus’ name. None of these, according to Matthew, are proof of genuine obedience to God’s will.

Taken in connection with Matthew 25 and Luke 4, the conclusion we can draw is that the gospel writers say, if you do all these other pious, charismatic things but do NOT do charity and justice for the least of these, Christ is telling you: “I never knew you! Away, you evildoer!” Obeying God’s will in doing charity and justice for the lost, the left out, the poor, the oppressed, THIS is proof that you actually know God, actually love Jesus, and actually follow Jesus!

Think about that! It’s not praying or singing worship songs where we call Jesus Lord. It’s not performing great miracles, prophecies or exorcisms or other charismatic abilities. Rather, it is the boring, unspectacular, ordinary and tedious works of mercy, charity, and justice for the least of these – whoever the least of these are (and I suggest it’s both Christians and non-Christians who are needy) – that proves you are a genuine Christ-follower.

Given this insight, and in light of Glenn Beck’s pronouncements, I wonder if Jesus would ask Christians to leave those churches that DO NOT preach social and economic justice! What do you think?

8 thoughts on “Jesus and Social Justice

  1. I DID get this auto-email of your response. Must have been my mistake before.

    Some years ago I asked Pastor Stanley Vander Klay about a man asking for financial help. In our conversation I mention a woman who had helped him by getting contributions from others. Pastor said he knew the woman and surprised me by strongly asserting that she was creating unhealthy dependencies.


  2. You will understand Jim Wallis and other progressives better if you get acquainted with 1960s Columbia professors Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven, authors of the Cloward-Piven strategy. They wrote about collapsing the economy and how they planned to do it in the article they co-authored article called, “Mobilizing the Poor: How it Could Be Done.” Six months later, it was published in The Nation, under the title “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty.”

    Click to access ClowardPiven.pdf

    Beck gives a brief overview of it’s effectiveness:,2933,582097,00.html

    P.S. I didn’t get an auto-email of your response.


    1. Thanks Randy for the links.

      As for auto-email, did you subscribe to the comment thread option when you submitted a comment? Otherwise, I don’t know why you didn’t get an auto-email notice. Sorry about that.


  3. As I have written you before, I have utmost respected for your spiritual insights. But you are wrong about Glenn Beck and Jim Wallis. Glenn Beck is not against social justice, but against the progressive form of social justice. You need to dig deeper into the progressive agenda and Jim Wallis. If you followed Glenn Beck carefully, you would see how well documented he has presented his case.


    1. Thanks Randy for responding. To be fair, I am no expert on Glenn Beck and his opinions. And my post here is not exactly an attack on Beck either. I was using Beck’s comments as a platform to enter the whole debate on social justice in the church.

      As for the progressive form of social justice, well, I have always found that these labels are almost always used to pigeon-hole and disparage one’s enemies! Some agenda that we don’t like becomes quickly either Radical, Progressive or Fundamentalist, Backward, depending on which side we are on.

      Now, to be fair and clear, I don’t think Beck was saying that churches shouldn’t preach or do charity work like helping the poor and feeding the hungry. I suspect he is okay with churches focusing on giving food to the hungry or even teaching the hungry skills in order to get jobs to earn money to find food. I suspect this is the form of social justice that Beck is okay with. Although I would probably call those acts of charity and mercy, rather than social justice per se.

      I think Glenn Beck thinks the church should not advocate for justice and fairness in economic structures and policies so that the hungry can have fair access to jobs and food. At least, in ways that upset his view of how the economy should be structured. That’s the social justice part that he is deriding against. Or, pardon me, the progressive social justice part.

      Here lies the difference between those who see poverty and other social ills as primarily an individualistic problem and those who see them as structural problems. Most conservative, right wing folks tend to see through the lens of individualism and think that only measures that help the individual – charity and mercy – should be practiced. More left-wing leaning folks would see them as structural problems, not merely individual responsibility, and seek to reform structures and policies. Of course, we need both types of measures.

      Perhaps, I might still be off base with Glenn Beck. As I’ve said, I am no expert on Beck. But from what I do know of his opinions and leanings, I would have to respectfully disagree with him. However, I am not all that interested in arguing whether he is right or wrong. My purpose of using his comment is more illustrative to nail down the point that this social activism and justice issue is a thorny point in the church today, especially among Evangelicals.

      But the overall point of my post is that social justice – in terms of structural changes, and not only acts of charity and mercy – is NOT OPTIONAL for the Christian church.


What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s